
Billy Corgan seems to be trying to lead The Smashing Pumpkins' legacy into stranger and weirder places these days. Whether it's turning a blind eye with the abdication of Jimmy Chamberlain, hiring a new 19 year old drummer, or telling his fans they suck, Corgan has been adamant that The Smashing Pumpkins are HIS band now, and he'll do whatever he damn well pleases. As such, yesterday's announcement about the release of a new Smashing Pumpkins album is just as strange.
Teargarden By Kaleidyscope will be a 44 song concept album about Corgan's tarot fascinations, released online and through limited edition E.P.s. Additionally, once all 44 songs are released, Corgan has promised fans a box set that culls together everything in one concise package.
Oh, and did I mention that the online downloads are free?
Let me repeat: Billy Corgan is NOT charging money for theses songs.
It's a dicey move, one that's grand enough for the Great Pumpkin and his humble little band, but can a project of this magnitude really sustain itself? It's hard enough to maintain a good double album full of quality material and rarely is a trilogy even attempted. 44 songs is a TON of music, and Corgan's promise of "the original psychedelic roots of The Smashing Pumpkins: atmospheric, melodic, heavy, and pretty" might not be enough to win over those who soured on Zeitgeist.
Here are some things to consider:
The Good:
-As an avid fan of Siamese Dream, Corgan's promise of the original Pumpkins sound does intrigue me. I'm not short-sided enough to believe this album is going to sound like a time capsule from 1993, but a bit more shoegaze and a little less metal could add some life to Corgan's recent output.
-Corgan has effectively diminished the effect music piracy can have on an album and is reaching out to Generation iTunes. His release of songs one at a time, for free, in a digital capacity, makes the release more difficult to really disperse for pirates. In fact, it asserts his artistic autonomy while presenting his distribution method as the best way to get the material. The added bonus of E.P.s and box sets are ideal for collectors and faithful fans. Is it the beginning of the musical revolution we so desperately need?
-Unlike some bands (I'm looking at you Bloc Party) that offer an incomplete album online, the Teargarden By Kaleidyscope project is the whole enchilada. Bravo, Billy.
The Bad:
-Will this seriously impact how we listen to records? Corgan is releasing these songs one at a time over the coming months, so unless fans hold out until all the material is out, they won't be experiencing the material as one complete work. This troubles me, especially because I'm a firm believer in "the album" as an art form.
-How will he maintain interest? While everyone is buzzing about it now, receiving updates via Facebook or Twitter will become monotonous for every song release. This is going to be a big challenge for him.
-What fidelity can fans expect with these initial releases? Will we have to wait a year before we experience these songs at 320 kbps? For audiophiles, this is really frustrating.
Ultimately, we'll have to wait to see the full success/failure of Corgan's newest ego trip. Yet if the songs are good, none of this might matter one single (pun intended) bit.
First digitally colored Teddy
-
I just got the idea to color some old Teddy cartoon using Photoshop and this
is the results. I like it
2 hours ago











.jpg)




7 comments:
Hi there,
Interesting entries you have here. While the artists u mentioned arent exactly my cup of tea, I love your thoughts and observations tt are found in all ur entries.
And a happy belated 22! My 22's just round the corner.
I have one thing to say:
UUUUGGGGGHHHHH! If he really believes this is the best way to go, he is sorrily mistaken (is that a word? it looks funny). You are right- the best way to listen to an album is AS A WHOLE. From beginning to end. I'm not a huge Smashing Pumpkins fan (like you, I only truly liked Siamese Dream), but even so, I can probably say that most fans are going to be upset they can only get one song at a time.
I would be EXTREMELY pissed if say, my favorite band were to do that. I'd be like, "WTF? Do you seriously expect me to respect you on this one?" I guess if you really love a band it's worth it, but most will probably forget about the next song that is supposed to come out by song number two.
@marzuki: Thanks so much for the birthday wishes. A Preemptive Happy Birthday to you as well! Sorry to hear you're not into the subject I'm talking about, but delighted that you'd spend the time to read my perspectives on it. I suppose I'm doing something right.
@Nicolette: I think he's desperately trying to do two things A) Stay relevant artistically and culturally. B) Circumvent the deadlines associated with recording albums. I think Billy wants to create things on HIS time table, and I think this method allows him too. I'll be downloading the tracks as they appear, but I'm extremely upset that his vision sacrifices something that makes music very special: The full album experience.
Oh, it's "sorely." :P
So if I'm understanding you correctly, your concern with the online release is that it's going to be parsed out over individual songs instead of an entire album- rather than the question of quality in a not-for-profit release from a band of Corgan's stature?
I'm curious as to what you think about NIN's "The Slip" and Atmosphere's "Strictly Leakage."
LOL! Yeah...I know how to spell sorely. I meant sorrily as in like, sorry...regretfully. lol.
I don't know, like I said, I didn't know if it was a word. It just kinda came flying out of the keyboard and I just didn't want to change it because that's how I felt lol.
And yeah, he could just be trying to control things. Which is good for an artist, to stay in control. It's just really disappointing when musicians lose that...what is it? Ummmm...
Ability to connect with the music lovers? Is that it? I don't know. It sounds like he's doing it more for the purpose of wanting the power and less for the fans, despite what he may say.
I'll just shut up now. So opinionated!
Oh and, GREAT NEWS!
I was correct! Sorrily IS a word it just looks really funny. It's an adverb according to dictionary.com. To feel regret, sympathetic, pitying.
So yes, I meant he will be sorrily mistaken. Okay NOW I'm done.
@Seth: Quality is an issue with Corgan in a number of ways.
When it comes to bit rate quality, NINs provided the best with multiple mp3 options, FLAC, and AAC. Corgan hasn't stated the bit rates and I'm nervous about that. But my biggest issue of quality stems from not being able to hear the complete work at the time of download. It's the quality of that first listening experience not being a complete one. The Slip, Ghosts I-IV, and In Rainbows are all one shots and you could go on a night drive and experience the work in whole. This won't be, and I wonder how that will effect reactions to the music.
And as far as quality for a not-for-profit releases, The Slip, Ghosts I-IV, Strictly Leakage, In Rainbows are all fantastic albums. I think Corgan can make a great one too, it just depends. I'm worried when people say they are going back to their roots. While I LOVED Zeitgeist, I'm not about to say it was a complete hit and many people felt it was below average.
@Nicolette: It is about control for him, it always has been. The question is whether or not this puts an emphasis allowing free music with special physical copies for collectors. It's too early to tell, but I thought I'd bring that up.
OH, and color me corrected! :P
Post a Comment